New Proudly Ghanaian · Read our poultry guides on the Agro Prime Blog · Book a visit here →
Feeding & Nutrition

Pearson Square Feed Formulation: A Ghana Farmer's Guide

How to blend maize, soybean meal and fishmeal to a target protein level using the Pearson Square, with local crude-protein values and a worked grower ration.

Agro Prime Ghana TeamUpdated 23 Sep 202615 min read

Walk into any poultry farm around Kasoa where the keeper mixes their own feed, and you will usually find the same quiet anxiety: is this ration actually giving the birds the protein they need, or am I guessing? Feed is by far the biggest cost in poultry — commonly 60–70% of what it takes to raise a bird — so a ration that is a few points short on protein wastes money twice over, once on the ingredients and again on the growth you never get. The Pearson Square is the oldest and simplest tool for taking the guesswork out of that decision. It will not design a perfect diet on its own, but it lets you blend ingredients to hit a target protein level using nothing more than a pen, and it is a genuinely useful skill for any Ghanaian farmer buying maize, soya and fishmeal by the bag. This guide explains exactly how it works, with worked examples built on real local ingredient values.

Written by the Agro Prime Ghana poultry team and reviewed against current animal-nutrition references (Donkoh & Attoh-Kotoku, KNUST, and FAO feedstuff data). Last updated September 2026.

Key takeaways

The Pearson Square is a quick method for blending two feedstuffs — one high in protein, one low — to hit a target crude protein (CP) percentage. You put the two ingredient CP values on the left corners, your target in the middle, subtract diagonally, and read off the parts of each ingredient. Local CP values matter: Ghanaian studies put maize at roughly 8–9% CP, wheat bran ~16%, soybean meal ~48–51%, and fishmeal ~48–64%, with groundnut cake around 45%. Typical protein targets are about 22–23% for broiler starter, 18–20% for growers/finishers, and 16–18% for layers. The square balances protein only — you still have to check energy, calcium, phosphorus, methionine and lysine, and add a vitamin–mineral premix. Used sensibly, it turns feed mixing from guesswork into arithmetic.

What the Pearson Square is — and what it is not

The Pearson Square (sometimes called the "box method") is a very old piece of feed-mixing arithmetic that answers one narrow question: if I want a mix of a given protein level, how much of a high-protein ingredient and how much of a low-protein ingredient do I combine? That is all it does, and understanding that limit is the key to using it well. It is a two-ingredient balancing act — one "energy" feed that is low in protein, such as maize, and one "protein" feed that is high in protein, such as soybean meal or fishmeal. As the trade guides that teach the method make plain (see the walkthrough at Feed Strategy), you write the protein value of each ingredient at the left corners of a square, put your target in the centre, and subtract along the diagonals to find the parts of each ingredient required. It is elegant precisely because it is simple: no spreadsheet, no software, no electricity — just a value you can trust for each ingredient and a minute of arithmetic. What it will not do is balance energy, amino acids, calcium, phosphorus or vitamins. A ration can hit its protein target perfectly on the square and still be a poor diet if the energy is wrong or the calcium is missing. Treat the square as the first step, not the whole job.

Why getting formulation right matters so much in Ghana

Feed economics are unforgiving here. Because feed is the dominant cost in poultry, and Ghana's rations lean heavily on maize — a crop whose price swings with the season and import pressure — every farmer mixing feed is chasing a nutritional target while ingredient costs keep moving. Buy protein you do not need and you burn cash; skimp on it and birds grow slowly, layers miss peak, and feed conversion worsens. The Ghanaian feedstuff study by Donkoh and Attoh-Kotoku at KNUST measured local ingredients and found real variation — their fishmeal samples ranged from about 49% to 64% crude protein — which is exactly why formulating from assumed textbook values can quietly let you down. The Pearson Square does not fix ingredient variability, but it forces you to write down the number you are trusting for each feedstuff, and that discipline alone catches a lot of expensive mistakes. If you are new to mixing at all, start with our guide on how to make poultry feed in Ghana and use the square alongside it.

Horizontal bar chart comparing crude protein of common Ghanaian feed ingredients, from maize at 8.2% up to fishmeal at 63.6%. Source: Donkoh & Attoh-Kotoku 2009, KNUST.
Protein feeds like fishmeal and soybean meal carry far more crude protein than maize, which is why rations blend high- and low-protein ingredients. Source: Donkoh & Attoh-Kotoku 2009, KNUST.

Know your ingredients before you touch the square

The square is only as good as the numbers you feed it, so the first job is knowing the crude protein of what is actually in your store. The values below draw on the KNUST Ghana feedstuff study and standard FAO feed tables; treat them as working figures, because the same ingredient varies with source, processing and freshness. The worked ration in the table further down puts these to use in a real grower mix.

IngredientRole in the rationApprox. crude proteinParts in a worked 18% grower mix*
MaizeMain energy source~8–9%62 kg
Wheat branEnergy / fibre, bulk~16%10 kg
Soybean mealMain plant protein~48–51%18 kg
FishmealProtein + amino acids~48–64%6 kg
Groundnut cakeProtein (aflatoxin-risk)~45%—
Oyster shell / limestoneCalcium—2 kg
Premix + salt + methionine/lysineVitamins, minerals, amino acids—2 kg

*Illustrative 100 kg grower mix landing near 18% CP; always cross-check against a nutritionist's specification, adjust for your measured ingredient values, and guard against aflatoxin in maize and groundnut cake.

The Pearson Square, step by step

Here is the method in full, using two ingredients most Ghanaian keepers have on hand: maize (call it 9% CP) and soybean meal (call it 48% CP). Suppose you want a simple mix at 18% CP — a reasonable grower/finisher level.

  • Step 1. Draw a square. Write your target, 18, in the centre.
  • Step 2. Put maize's protein (9) at the top-left corner and soybean meal's protein (48) at the bottom-left corner.
  • Step 3. Subtract diagonally, always the smaller from the larger. Top-left to centre: 18 − 9 = 9; write this at the bottom-right corner. Bottom-left to centre: 48 − 18 = 30; write this at the top-right corner.
  • Step 4. Read the results across from each ingredient. The top-right figure (30) is the parts of maize; the bottom-right figure (9) is the parts of soybean meal. Total parts = 30 + 9 = 39.
  • Step 5. Convert to percentages. Maize = 30 ÷ 39 = 76.9%; soybean meal = 9 ÷ 39 = 23.1%.

So a blend of roughly 77% maize and 23% soybean meal gives you about 18% crude protein. You can prove it: (0.769 × 9) + (0.231 × 48) = 6.9 + 11.1 = 18.0. That check — multiply each ingredient's fraction by its protein and add them up — is worth doing every time; it takes ten seconds and catches arithmetic slips before they cost you a batch. Notice the logic built into the square: the ingredient furthest from the target in protein terms ends up as the larger share, which is why the low-protein maize dominates the mix.

Field note: measure your own ingredients where you can

On the farm we have learned to distrust a single "book value" for fishmeal and groundnut cake in particular, because both vary a lot with source and adulteration. Fishmeal sold in the market is sometimes stretched with salt, bran or shell, which drags its real protein well below the 60%-plus you are paying for. When a batch of birds underperforms on a ration that looked correct on paper, the ingredient is often the first suspect, not the formula. Where a feed mill or lab will run a proximate analysis, it is money well spent for anyone mixing in volume — and at minimum, buy protein feeds from sources you trust and inspect every delivery.

Using the square for real rations: the two-ingredient trick

Real poultry feed is never just two ingredients, so how do practitioners stretch a two-ingredient tool to a full ration? The standard trick is to treat your feed as two groups: an "energy" group (maize, wheat bran, rice bran) and a "protein" group (soybean meal, fishmeal, groundnut cake). Work out the average protein of each group as you intend to combine them, then run those two averages through the square exactly as above. If your protein group is a 50:50 blend of soybean meal (48%) and fishmeal (60%), its average is 54%; if your energy group is mostly maize with a little bran, its average might be about 10%. Put 10 and 54 on the square against your target, and it tells you the proportion of energy group to protein group; you then split each group back into its individual ingredients in the ratio you chose. It is not as precise as computer least-cost formulation, but it is far better than guessing and stays inside what a busy farmer can do by hand.

A worked grower ration you can adapt

The table earlier in this guide lays out an illustrative 100 kg grower mix aiming near 18% CP: about 62 kg maize, 10 kg wheat bran, 18 kg soybean meal, 6 kg fishmeal, 2 kg calcium source (oyster shell or limestone), and 2 kg of premix, salt and synthetic amino acids. The protein ingredients (soybean meal and fishmeal) are doing the heavy lifting, the maize and bran provide energy and bulk, and the last 4 kg fixes the things the square ignores — minerals, vitamins and the amino acids methionine and lysine that plant proteins run short on. This is the shape of a workable ration, but it is a starting template, not a prescription: your exact figures depend on the real protein of your maize and soya, your birds' age, and whether you are feeding broilers or layers. For age-appropriate targets, read our broiler feeding guide and layer feeding guide alongside this one, and adjust the square's target to match the stage you are feeding.

Balancing what the square leaves out

Because the Pearson Square only balances protein, the difference between a passable ration and a good one lives in the parts it cannot see:

  • Energy. Birds eat to meet their energy need, so a ration too low in energy leaves them hungry and a ration too high dilutes everything else. Maize supplies most of the energy; if you cut maize to raise protein, watch that energy does not fall too far.
  • Calcium and phosphorus. Layers in particular need a lot of calcium for eggshell — far more than a grower — which is why the calcium source is a separate line, not something the protein maths handles. Getting the calcium-to-phosphorus balance wrong is a direct route to rickets in growers and thin shells in layers.
  • Amino acids. Crude protein is a blunt measure. Two rations can share the same protein figure yet perform very differently because one is short on methionine or lysine, the amino acids that limit growth in maize-soya diets. This is why supplemental methionine and lysine earn their place in the premix line.
  • Vitamins and trace minerals. A commercial vitamin–mineral premix, added at the maker's inclusion rate, covers what whole ingredients cannot reliably supply.

None of this makes the square useless — it makes it the first calculation in a sequence. Nail the protein with the square, then layer the rest on top.

Field note: cheapest protein is not cheapest feed

When maize prices climb, the temptation is to lean harder on the cheapest protein source to prop up the protein figure. But a ration that reads 18% on paper can still perform badly if that protein is poorly digestible or short on the right amino acids — groundnut cake, for instance, is cheap protein but carries a real aflatoxin risk, and over-relied-upon plant proteins leave methionine short. We judge a ration by what the birds do — daily gain, feed conversion, egg numbers and shell quality — not by the protein number alone. The square gets you to the right protein cheaply; the birds tell you whether the rest of the diet is right.

Common mistakes that undo good arithmetic

Most Pearson Square failures are not maths errors — they are input errors. The commonest is trusting an inflated ingredient value: assuming market fishmeal is 65% protein when the real batch is nearer 45% throws the whole mix off, always toward too little protein. Next is ignoring energy — loading soybean meal until the ration is protein-rich but energy-poor, so birds under-eat. Then forgetting the non-protein essentials — feeding a balanced protein blend with no added calcium, premix or amino acids — and not re-running the square when prices or suppliers change, since a new maize source or a switch to groundnut cake changes the numbers. The last, quietly costly one is mixing badly: even a perfect formula fails if ingredients are not ground and blended evenly, so some birds get the premix and others get none. Good formulation and good mixing are two halves of the same job.

The bottom line on the Pearson Square

The Pearson Square earns its long life because it does one useful thing reliably: it turns "how much soya do I add?" from a guess into a calculation any farmer can do on the back of a feed sack. Put your two ingredients' protein values on the corners, your target in the middle, subtract diagonally, and read off the mix — then always check the result by multiplying back. But respect its limits. It balances protein and nothing else, and it is only as honest as the ingredient values you give it, which in Ghana's markets can vary a lot. Use it as the opening move: hit your protein target with the square, then build energy, calcium, phosphorus, amino acids and a premix around it, and let the birds' performance be the final judge. Do that, and you get the real prize — a ration that feeds your flock properly without feeding your money to guesswork.

Frequently asked questions

What is the Pearson Square used for?
It is a simple arithmetic method for blending two feedstuffs — one low in protein (like maize) and one high in protein (like soybean meal or fishmeal) — to reach a target crude protein percentage. You place the two ingredient protein values on the corners of a square, your target in the centre, and subtract diagonally to find the parts of each ingredient. It answers only the protein-balancing question; it does not balance energy, calcium, phosphorus, amino acids or vitamins, which you must handle separately.
What crude protein should I target for my birds?
Typical targets are roughly 22–23% for broiler starter, around 18–20% for broiler grower/finisher, and about 16–18% for laying hens, with pullet growers somewhere in between. Younger, fast-growing birds need more protein; older and laying birds need relatively less protein but more calcium. Always match the target to the bird's stage, and lean on stage-specific feeding guides rather than feeding one protein level across the whole life of the flock.
What is the crude protein of maize, soybean meal and fishmeal in Ghana?
Working values from Ghanaian feedstuff data and standard feed tables are roughly: maize 8–9%, wheat bran about 16%, soybean meal about 48–51%, groundnut cake around 45%, and fishmeal anywhere from about 48% to 64% depending on quality. The wide fishmeal range matters — market fishmeal is often adulterated — so measure or buy from trusted sources rather than assuming the top of the range. These are the numbers you plug into the square.
Can I use the Pearson Square for a full poultry ration?
Yes, with a common workaround: treat your feed as two groups — an energy group (maize, bran) and a protein group (soybean meal, fishmeal) — work out the average protein of each group, then run those two averages through the square. That tells you the proportion of energy group to protein group; you then split each group into its individual ingredients. It is less precise than computer least-cost formulation but far better than guessing and doable by hand.
Why does my feed underperform even when the protein maths is correct?
Usually because something outside protein is wrong. The ingredient values you trusted may be inflated (adulterated fishmeal is a classic), the energy may be too low so birds under-eat, or the ration may be short on methionine, lysine, calcium, phosphorus or a vitamin–mineral premix. Poor mixing also undoes a good formula. The square only balances protein, so a correct protein figure is necessary but not sufficient for good performance.
How do I check my Pearson Square answer is right?
Multiply each ingredient's fraction by its protein value and add them up — the total should equal your target. For a 77% maize (9%) and 23% soybean meal (48%) mix: (0.77 × 9) + (0.23 × 48) ≈ 6.9 + 11.1 = 18%. If the sum does not match your target, you have made an arithmetic slip somewhere, most often in the diagonal subtraction. This ten-second check should be routine for every batch.
Is groundnut cake a good protein source for poultry?
It is a useful and often cheaper plant protein at around 45% crude protein, but it carries a serious caveat: groundnut is highly prone to aflatoxin, a mould toxin that damages the liver, suppresses immunity and hurts growth even at low levels. If you use groundnut cake, it must be clean, well-dried and well-stored, ideally with a toxin binder as backup. Many keepers lean more on soybean meal and fishmeal for that reason, using groundnut cake cautiously.
Do I still need a vitamin–mineral premix if my protein is balanced?
Yes, absolutely. Whole ingredients like maize and soya cannot reliably supply the full range of vitamins and trace minerals birds need, and maize-soya diets are also short on the amino acids methionine and lysine. A commercial premix, added at the manufacturer's recommended inclusion rate, plus a calcium source and often supplemental methionine and lysine, covers what the Pearson Square cannot. Skipping the premix is one of the commonest reasons a correctly formulated ration still fails.

Sources & further reading

About Agro Prime Ghana

Agro Prime Ghana Limited runs a poultry hatchery and mixed agribusiness in Kasoa, supplying day-old chicks and supporting poultry keepers across the country with practical feeding and management advice. These guides combine hands-on hatchery and farm experience with current animal-nutrition references. This article is general educational information, not a substitute for a qualified nutritionist's ration formulation — for large or commercial mixing, have your ingredients analysed and your diets checked. Need chicks, feed advice or farm support? Book a visit or message us on WhatsApp (+233 24 915 1503).

Agro Prime Ghana TeamHatchery specialists and farmers at Agro Prime Ghana Limited, Kasoa. We hatch, brood and deliver day-old chicks across Ghana — and write what we've learned doing it.

Ready to start your flock?

Vaccinated day-old chicks, hatched in Kasoa and delivered anywhere in Ghana. Book a visit, or order on WhatsApp in under a minute.

Chat with us